tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2899018576420083198.post8717747997146537930..comments2023-08-12T00:51:02.219-07:00Comments on The Pilgrimgram: Mid-Course Correction Going OnUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2899018576420083198.post-69698888609215754012016-07-09T07:22:32.687-07:002016-07-09T07:22:32.687-07:00I identify with the second group more than the fir...I identify with the second group more than the first, even though my age is in the first. I attribute that to possibly the fact that I'm not a "lifer" as it were, Christian. I've only been saved for a relatively short period of time and I've never had the teaching on identifying as a servant - only a son. While I love to serve, I do it as a son. But to take it even further, I'm actually not even a son in the body of Christ anymore - I'm more of a Mother (Father) raising up mother's and fathers. The need is great...but, that in an entirely different blog post. :)<br /> Ginny Wilcoxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12784972916999190286noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2899018576420083198.post-38862141975808921612015-07-09T11:50:11.053-07:002015-07-09T11:50:11.053-07:00On the whole, I tend to agree. The one caveat is...On the whole, I tend to agree. The one caveat is when the more feet on the ground group is actually walking out some bad theology but because they think of themselves as the "feet on the ground" group, they aren't willing to have their underlying theology discussed because they think theology just isn't for them. In other words, everyone has some sort of theology underpinning the stuff they do - but some people are willing to examine it and identify it as such, where other people want to deny they have any theology whatsoever and become almost hostile towards discussing it. The "feet on the ground" group for instance tend to have a theology of incarnation that includes them being PART of the incarnation of Christ, whereas people who aren't so feet on the ground might be missing that idea in their theology. But on the flip side, theological errors (and their accompanying excesses and errors) are made in both groups - and wisdom is meant to help us function in this world, not to replace functioning in this world. So for instance, some folks end up getting burned pretty badly by theologies that are detrimental to functioning relationships, but they don't realize it's the theology burning them because they won't discuss the theology because it goes against their action-oriented mindset. And I could think of dozens of other examples.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com